Comparative judgment as facilitator for peer assessment

Comparative judgement has risen as an alternative assessment method for assessing competences and performances. This iterative process results in a collective professional consensus with high reliability and can be facilitated by digital tools providing promising results on how to facilitate increased affordances for teachers’ assessment practices for the sake of learning. This session provides an overview of comparative judgement and how it can be applied in various settings, e.g. as a facilitator for peer assessment for both students and teachers with examples primarily undertaken in STEM ed.